Unresolved Justice
The cases that remain open
A documented record of July cases where investigation, prosecution, trial or accountability remains incomplete.
An open case is not a finding of guilt or of concealment: every state is dated and derived from the record, drawing on 25 published sources. Skip to sources
What “unresolved” means here
This page records the July cases — deaths, injuries and proceedings — in which investigation, prosecution, trial or a final judgment is not yet on record. For each it sets out what happened, what is alleged and by whom, what has happened legally, and what remains unresolved, as the records the archive holds show them.
A case is listed here because the record shows a step still to come, not because anything has been proved or concealed. The full legal record of each proceeding — every dated step, the people named with a legal status, judgments and documents — is on Crimes & Accountability; this page carries only what remains open.
Four principles
- An unknown is not a cover-up
- Where the archive has found no record of an investigation, it says so: “No verified investigation record has yet been located by this archive.” It never says that none took place.
- Unresolved is not proof of guilt
- An open case names no one as responsible. People accused in a proceeding are presumed innocent until judgment, and a judgment at first instance is stated with where its appeal stands.
- Delay is not, by itself, misconduct
- Elapsed time is given in plain days to the archive’s review, as context. A long interval is not presented as evidence of obstruction or neglect.
- An allegation is not a fact
- What is alleged is stated with who alleges it. Where accounts conflict, each is given and none is preferred.
Why a case is open
- No verified investigation record
No verified investigation record has yet been located by this archive. It does not mean that no investigation happened.
On this page: 2 deaths · 3 injuries
- No charge on record
A case or complaint has been filed with the police, a court or the tribunal’s prosecution; no charge is reported in the sources read.
On this page: 4 deaths
- No trial on record
The prosecution has submitted formal charges; no framing of charges, trial or judgment is reported in the sources read.
On this page: 1 proceeding · 1 death
- Decision on charges pending
Formal charges have been argued before the tribunal, and it has set a date for its order on whether to frame them.
On this page: 1 proceeding · 1 death
- Judgment pending
The tribunal has framed charges and is hearing the case; no judgment yet.
None on record
- Finality not on record
A trial court has given judgment. No appeal and no final decision are reported in the sources read, so the archive does not record the judgment as final.
On this page: 1 proceeding
- Appeal pending
A trial court has given judgment and an appeal is on record; no decision on the appeal is recorded in this archive.
On this page: 3 proceedings · 1 death
- Status not recorded
The record does not show where accountability stands.
None on record
A state describes where the record of a case stands on the date given, not what happened or who is responsible. A case leaves this page only when a record of its closing step — a final judgment, or an investigation’s conclusion — exists.
This page records deaths, injuries and alleged abuses during the protests of July and August 2024, and where the proceedings over them stand. It contains no images and describes violence only as far as the record requires.
Where the open record stands
Every figure is counted from the records below, as of the archive’s review. It counts the cases this archive has read, not every open case in Bangladesh.
Counted from the record
- 6 of 6
- 9 of 9
- 3 of 3
- 3
- None on record
Every open proceeding
- The case against Sheikh Hasina and two others
Appeal pending — as of
Latest recorded step: · Appeal
Next known: No date on record
- The killing of Abu Sayed, Rangpur
Appeal pending — as of
Latest recorded step: Reported 17 July 2026 · Appeal
Next known: No date on record
- The killings in Chattogram, July 2024
No trial on record — as of
Latest recorded step: · Formal charges
Next known: No date on record
- The killings in Uttara, Dhaka, 18–19 July 2024
Decision on charges pending — as of
Latest recorded step: · Hearing
Next known: Scheduled for : the tribunal’s order on whether to frame charges. No later verified update is currently recorded. [1]
- The killings at Ashulia police station, Savar
Finality not on record — as of
Latest recorded step: · Judgment
Next known: No date on record
- The killings at Chankharpul, Dhaka
Appeal pending — as of
Latest recorded step: · Appeal
Next known: No date on record
Charged, no trial on record
The prosecution has submitted formal charges. No framing of charges or trial is reported.
The killings in Chattogram, July 2024
No trial on record — as of · International Crimes Tribunal-1, Dhaka
July 2024; Wasim Akram on 16 July · Chattogram
Crimes against humanity over the killing of six people in Chattogram during the protests, among them Wasim Akram; 22 accused, all affiliated with the Awami League and its associate bodies, according to the prosecution’s filing. [2]
The charges as the prosecution brings them, as reported. No court has ruled on them.
The prosecution submits formal charges against 22 people to the tribunal’s registrar. [2]
Reported — published by the reports cited; not yet checked against a primary record. Sources: The Business Standard.
Formal charges were submitted (5 April 2026). No framing of charges, trial or judgment is recorded in this archive, and no court has ruled on the allegations. [2]
Next known: No next date is on record.
185 days between the latest report on this proceeding () and this review ().
Awaiting a decision on charges
The charges have been argued before the tribunal, and it has set a date for its order on whether to frame them.
The killings in Uttara, Dhaka, 18–19 July 2024
Decision on charges pending — as of · International Crimes Tribunal-2, Dhaka
18–19 July 2024 · Uttara, Dhaka
- Shooting in Uttara · Uttara
- Mir Mahfuzur Rahman Mugdho
- Jahiduzzaman Tanvin
- Sheikh Fahmin Zafar
- Md Shakil Hossain
- Md Sabbir Hossain
- Sajib Sarker
- Mokhlesur Rahman Durjoy
- Ridwan Sharif
- Md Sabbir Islam
- Md Asadullah
- Naima Sultana
Crimes against humanity over the killing of 11 people in Uttara on 18 and 19 July 2024; 26 accused, among them a former member of parliament and a former police commissioner of Dhaka. [3]
The charges as the prosecution brings them, as reported. No court has ruled on them.
The order on framing charges, deferred from 16 to 23 September, is deferred again to 11 October 2026. [1]
Reported — published by the reports cited; not yet checked against a primary record. Sources: TOB News.
No decision on whether to frame charges is recorded, no trial has begun, and no court has ruled on the allegations. [1]
Next known: Scheduled for : the tribunal’s order on whether to frame charges. No later verified update is currently recorded. [1]
14 days between the latest report on this proceeding () and this review ().
Judgment given, finality not on record
A judgment at first instance is reported. Neither an appeal nor a final decision is reported in the sources read, so the judgment is not recorded as final.
The killings at Ashulia police station, Savar
Finality not on record — as of · International Crimes Tribunal-2, Dhaka
5 August 2024 · Near Ashulia police station, Savar
- Police still shooting · Chankharpul, Rampura bridge, Jatrabari police station, Ashulia and Savar bus stand
- Sajjad Hossain Sajal
- As-Sabur
- Tanzil Mahmud Sujoy
- Bayezid Bostami
- Abul Hossain
- Md Omar Faruk
- Name not recorded
Crimes against humanity over the killing of seven people near Ashulia police station on 5 August 2024 and the burning of six of their bodies; 16 accused. [4, 5]
The charges on which the tribunal gave judgment at first instance, as reported.
The tribunal sentences six people to death — a former member of parliament, a local Jubo League leader and four police members — seven to life imprisonment and two to seven years; one accused who gave evidence for the prosecution is pardoned. Eight of the accused are absconding. No appeal is reported in the sources read. [4, 5]
Reported — published by the reports cited; not yet checked against a primary record. Sources: Prothom Alo; New Age.
Judgments under appeal
A judgment at first instance is reported and an appeal is on record. Until the appeal is decided, the judgment is not the last word.
The case against Sheikh Hasina and two others
Appeal pending — as of · International Crimes Tribunal-1, Dhaka
July and August 2024 · Across Bangladesh: the crackdown as a whole
Crimes against humanity in the government’s crackdown on the protests of July and August 2024. [6]
The charges on which the tribunal gave judgment at first instance, as reported.
17 November 2025: guilty on charges under the doctrine of superior command responsibility. [6, 7]
Reported — published by the reports cited; not yet checked against a primary record. Sources: Al Jazeera; The Business Standard.
On 15 December 2025 the prosecution appealed to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, seeking to raise the sentences of imprisonment until natural death imposed on Sheikh Hasina and Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal to death. [7] No judgment on the appeal is recorded in this archive.
Reported — published by the reports cited; not yet checked against a primary record. Sources: The Business Standard.
An appeal is on record (the latest entry on it: 15 December 2025). No decision on it is recorded in this archive, so no judgment in this proceeding is recorded as final. [7]
Next known: No hearing date for the appeal is on record.
296 days between the latest report on this proceeding () and this review ().
The killing of Abu Sayed, Rangpur
Appeal pending — as of · International Crimes Tribunal-2, Dhaka
16 July 2024 · Outside Begum Rokeya University, Rangpur
- The first deaths · Begum Rokeya University
Crimes against humanity over the killing of Abu Sayed outside Begum Rokeya University on 16 July 2024; 30 accused. [8, 9]
The charges on which the tribunal gave judgment at first instance, as reported.
The tribunal convicts all 30 accused: two former police members are sentenced to death, three people to life imprisonment and the remaining 25 to prison terms of up to ten years. Six of the accused are present; the others are tried in absentia. [8, 9, 10]
Reported — published by the reports cited; not yet checked against a primary record. Sources: The Business Standard; Dhaka Tribune; Prothom Alo.
Reported 17 July 2026
Four of the convicted, the two sentenced to death among them, appeal to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court seeking acquittal. No decision on the appeals is on record in this archive. [11]
Reported — published by the reports cited; not yet checked against a primary record. Sources: The New Nation.
An appeal is on record (the latest entry on it: reported 17 July 2026). No decision on it is recorded in this archive, so no judgment in this proceeding is recorded as final. [11]
Next known: No hearing date for the appeal is on record.
82 days between the latest report on this proceeding () and this review ().
The killings at Chankharpul, Dhaka
Appeal pending — as of · International Crimes Tribunal-1, Dhaka
5 August 2024 · Chankharpul, Dhaka
- Police still shooting · Chankharpul, Rampura bridge, Jatrabari police station, Ashulia and Savar bus stand
- Shahriar Khan Anas
- Sheikh Mahdi Hasan Zunayed
- Md Yakub
- Md Rakib Hawlader
- Md Ismamul Haque
- Manik Miah
Crimes against humanity over the killing of six people in police firing at Chankharpul on 5 August 2024; eight accused, all former police officers. [12]
The charges on which the tribunal gave judgment at first instance, as reported.
The tribunal convicts all eight: three former senior officers of the Dhaka Metropolitan Police are sentenced to death and five others to terms of three to six years. Four of the convicted, the three sentenced to death among them, are absconding. [12]
Reported — published by the reports cited; not yet checked against a primary record. Sources: The Business Standard.
On the prosecution’s appeal for heavier sentences, filed on 29 January, the Appellate Division orders that the five convicted to prison terms are not to be released until the appeal is decided. No decision on the appeal is on record in this archive. [13]
Reported — published by the reports cited; not yet checked against a primary record. Sources: The Business Standard.
An appeal is on record (the latest entry on it: 1 February 2026). No decision on it is recorded in this archive, so no judgment in this proceeding is recorded as final. [13]
Next known: No hearing date for the appeal is on record.
248 days between the latest report on this proceeding () and this review ().
Accused not before the court
What the reports say about accused people who were not before the court, kept apart by the legal term each report uses. Each is a dated statement, not a current count, and no figures are added across reports. People are named only as a proceeding’s title or a report names them.
Warrant issued by a court
A court has ordered that the people named be arrested. A warrant is not a charge and establishes nothing about guilt.
The killings in Chattogram, July 2024
The tribunal issues arrest warrants for 15 people over the killing of Wasim Akram. [14]
What remains unresolved: The report does not say whether each person has since been arrested, and no later report of it is recorded in this archive.
Wanted by police
The police list a person as sought. It is a police notice, not a court order or a finding.
None on record in the July proceedings tracked. No report in the July record read uses the term, so no one is described as wanted.
Absconding, according to a report
A report of a hearing or judgment says that some accused were not before the court and had not surrendered. It is a dated statement of that day, not a current count.
The killings at Chankharpul, Dhaka
Four of the eight convicted, the three sentenced to death among them, are absconding. [12]
The killings in Uttara, Dhaka, 18–19 July 2024
Eight of the 26 accused are in jail and 18 absconding. [3]
What remains unresolved: No later report of the arrest or surrender of those accused is recorded in this archive.
Tried in absentia
The court heard the case without the accused present. It records that they were not before the court, not where they are.
The case against Sheikh Hasina and two others
Two of the three accused are tried in absentia; the former inspector-general of police is present at the tribunal. [6] Sheikh Hasina left the country on 5 August 2024 and has lived in India since. [15, 6]
The killing of Abu Sayed, Rangpur
Six of the 30 accused are present at the tribunal; the others are tried in absentia. [8, 9]
What remains unresolved: No later report that those tried in absentia have appeared before the court is recorded in this archive.
People named in a proceeding with an individual, dated legal status are listed on Crimes & Accountability.
Deaths still awaiting accountability
Each person in the Martyrs register, in its order of date of death, with where accountability for the death stands. Who they were and what is known of how they died is on their memorial entry.
Abu Sayed
Died · Rangpur
Appeal pending — as of
Covered by a tracked proceeding: The killing of Abu Sayed, Rangpur
What remains unresolved: The convictions are under appeal by four of those convicted; the Appellate Division’s decision is not on record. [11]
Wasim Akram
Died · Chattogram
No trial on record — as of
Covered by a tracked proceeding: The killings in Chattogram, July 2024
What remains unresolved: Formal charges were submitted in April 2026; no trial or judgment is on record, and who fired has not been decided by a court. [2]
Hasan Mehedi
Died · Dhaka
No charge on record — as of
Two cases were filed, one with a court and one with the police. A year later Prothom Alo reported no progress, and RSF that two people had been identified and one arrested. [16, 17]
What remains unresolved: Who shot him has not been established: the account of a journalist who saw it and the account of the police differ, and no trial is on record. [18]
Md Shakil Hossain
Died · Dhaka or Gazipur (the sources differ)
No charge on record — as of
His family filed a complaint with the International Crimes Tribunal, Prothom Alo reported a year later. [16]
What remains unresolved: Where he was killed and whether he was working are disputed, and whether he is the Md Shakil Hossain named in the Uttara proceeding has not been established.
Mir Mughdo
Died · Dhaka
Decision on charges pending — as of
Covered by a tracked proceeding: The killings in Uttara, Dhaka, 18–19 July 2024
What remains unresolved: The tribunal had not decided by 23 September 2026 whether to frame charges, and no one has been tried for his death. [1]
Abu Taher Md Turab
Died · Sylhet
Tahir Zaman Priyo
Died · Dhaka
No charge on record — as of
Cases were filed with New Market police station and with the International Crimes Tribunal, Prothom Alo reported a year later. [16]
What remains unresolved: No charge or trial over his death is on record in this archive.
Pradip Kumar Bhowmik
Died · Sirajganj
No verified investigation record — as of
No case or investigation into his death is reported in the sources read, including RSF’s review a year later. [17]
What remains unresolved: Who killed him, and in what circumstances, is not established; the two published accounts differ.
Sohel Akhanji
Died · Habiganj
Injuries still awaiting accountability
Each person in the Injured & Survivors record, with where accountability for their injury stands. What happened to them, and what has followed, is on their entry.
Abdullah Al Imran
Injured · Dhaka
No verified investigation record — as of
No case or investigation over his shooting is reported in the sources read.
Gave evidence in The case against Sheikh Hasina and two others on , as the second prosecution witness. [19, 20] Testimony is evidence in that proceeding, not a case over this injury.
What remains unresolved: Who fired at him has not been established, and no court in the sources read has decided whether the instruction he described was given.
Atikul Gazi
Injured · Dhaka
No verified investigation record — as of
No case or investigation over his shooting is reported in the sources read.
What remains unresolved: Who fired at him is not established; the only account of the shooting in the sources read is his own.
Khokon Chandra Barman
Injured · Dhaka
No verified investigation record — as of
No case or investigation over his own shooting is reported in the sources read. The case he testified in concerns the crackdown as a whole. [21]
Gave evidence in The case against Sheikh Hasina and two others on , as the first prosecution witness. [21, 22] Testimony is evidence in that proceeding, not a case over this injury.
What remains unresolved: No court has decided who fired the shot that injured him; at the tribunal the defence disputed that police fired at all. [21]
Disputed accounts
Questions on which the records conflict. Each account is given with who gave it; the archive does not choose between them, and a denial is kept with the allegation it answers.
Who was responsible for the violence and the deaths?
- The government at the time
- In visits to a vandalised metro station, the burned television building and hospitals in late July 2024, the prime minister publicly placed all blame for the violence and loss of life on opposition parties. Former senior officials told the UN investigators that the violence had been planned and orchestrated by BNP and Jamaat-e-Islami. [15]
- The UN fact-finding report, February 2025
- Found no information to corroborate the claim that the violence was orchestrated by BNP or Jamaat-e-Islami, and found that the vast majority of deaths appear to have been caused by firearms used by the security forces. It found that BNP and Jamaat-e-Islami supporters and local leaders took part in some revenge violence, without finding it orchestrated by their national leaderships. [15]
- International Crimes Tribunal-1, November 2025
- Convicted Sheikh Hasina and her home minister, Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal, of crimes against humanity in their absence. Hasina called the verdicts the work of “a rigged tribunal”. The convictions are set out with their legal status in the archive’s accountability record. [6]
- The case against Sheikh Hasina and two others — Appeal pending. A judgment at first instance bears on the question; it is not recorded as final.
Who shot Abu Sayed?
- The police, 17 July 2024
- The first information report filed by a police sub-inspector says he fell “at one stage of firing and throwing of bricks from different directions by the protesters”, and does not mention police firing. [23]
- Prothom Alo, 28 July 2024
- Reported that several videos show police shooting him from close range, and that the doctor who carried out the autopsy found shotgun pellet wounds. [23]
- The UN fact-finding report, February 2025
- Found reasonable grounds to believe that police shot him with shotguns while he posed no threat; widely circulated footage showed the shooting. [15]
- The killing of Abu Sayed, Rangpur — Appeal pending. A judgment at first instance bears on the question; it is not recorded as final.
Who fired at protesters where Khokon Chandra Barman was injured (in front of Jatrabari police station, Dhaka)?
- Khokon Chandra Barman, testifying on 3 August 2025
- Police withdrew into Jatrabari police station when the army arrived; after the army left, police came out and fired on protesters sheltering under the flyover, and an officer fired at him where he had taken cover. [21, 22]
- Defence counsel for Sheikh Hasina and Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal, cross-examining
- Said that police did not fire on protesters and that demonstrators were injured or killed by their own weapons, and pointed to differences between his statement in court and his earlier statement to investigators. He answered that this was not true. [21, 22]
- The case against Sheikh Hasina and two others — Appeal pending. A judgment at first instance bears on the question; it is not recorded as final.
Did anyone fire guns from helicopters?
- Witnesses, as interviewed by the UN investigators
- Said they saw personnel in helicopters fire rifles or shotguns at protesters on 19–21 July in parts of Dhaka and Gazipur. [15]
- RAB and the police leadership
- RAB said it fired 738 tear gas shells and 1,047 sound and stun grenades from helicopters but never a rifle or shotgun; the police and RAB chiefs could not confirm any shooting from helicopters. [15]
- The UN fact-finding report, February 2025
- Could neither confirm nor exclude it, noting that the reported shootings fell while the internet was cut, and called for further investigation. [15]
- No proceeding tracked bears on it. The accounts are kept side by side, none preferred.
Is the Md Shakil Hossain named in the Uttara proceeding the journalist?
- The name, date and place match, but no source read links the two. The journalist is profiled once; the name in the proceeding is not linked to his entry until a source does. Proceeding: The killings in Uttara, Dhaka, 18–19 July 2024
Who was the seventh person killed at Ashulia?
- The proceeding is listed with “Name not recorded” for the seventh person. Whether “Abdul” is that person, or one of those named under another spelling, has not been established. Proceeding: The killings at Ashulia police station, Savar
What remains unknown
Questions the record leaves open, each with its basis. A question leaves this list only when a record answers it.
What will the Appellate Division decide on the prosecution’s appeal?
The prosecution’s appeal to the Appellate Division was filed on 15 December 2025; this archive holds no record of its outcome. [7]
Will anyone who served in the Army or the intelligence agencies be prosecuted?
When the UN fact-finding report was finalised in February 2025 it had received no information on criminal prosecutions of personnel who served with the Army, DGFI or NSI; this archive has not yet reviewed later records. [15]
Who are the dead who have not been identified?
In August 2025, 114 people buried as unclaimed at Rayerbazar graveyard during July and August 2024 remained unidentified. [25]
Will the revenge killings and the attacks on minorities be prosecuted?
The UN fact-finding report found that many perpetrators apparently continue to enjoy impunity. [15]
Next known milestones
Dates a court has set for its next step. A date stays scheduled until it comes; once it passes, it is shown as held only when a reviewed record of it exists.
- The killings in Uttara, Dhaka, 18–19 July 2024International Crimes Tribunal-2, Dhaka
- The tribunal’s order on whether to frame charges
- Date passed — no later verified update is currently recorded
- Reported [1]
Appeals with no date on record
- The case against Sheikh Hasina and two others
An appeal is on record. No hearing date for it is on record in this archive.
- The killing of Abu Sayed, Rangpur
An appeal is on record. No hearing date for it is on record in this archive.
- The killings at Chankharpul, Dhaka
An appeal is on record. No hearing date for it is on record in this archive.
Elsewhere in the archive
The full legal record of each proceeding — every dated step, the people named with a legal status, the judgments and the documents.
Crimes & Accountability
- July Martyrs
The register of those who died: who they were, and what is known of how.
- Injured & Survivors
People injured who survived, in their own public accounts.
- July Uprising
The events these cases concern, day by day.
Sources and method
This record was compiled by Justice for Hadi from the archive’s canonical July records: the proceedings tracked on Crimes & Accountability, the dates courts have set, the reports of warrants and absence, the Martyrs register, the Injured & Survivors record, and the disputes and open questions of the July pages. Each of those rests on the UN fact-finding report and on news reports, read in full; every numbered citation points to the publication that reports the fact.
Every entry carries the project’s evidence word in text. “Reported” means published by the sources cited and not yet checked against a primary record; “Alleged” names who made the claim. The archive holds no court document, so no entry is marked “Court record”. None of these records has yet been through the project’s formal verification process.
Archive reviewed through . A wrong name, date, status or attribution on this page is serious. Anyone with a documented correction or response can reach the project through corrections and right of reply; meaningful corrections are noted, not silently overwritten. For how the project works, see the research methodology.
Principles
- An unknown is not a cover-up
- Where the archive has found no record of an investigation, it says so: “No verified investigation record has yet been located by this archive.” It never says that none took place.
- Unresolved is not proof of guilt
- An open case names no one as responsible. People accused in a proceeding are presumed innocent until judgment, and a judgment at first instance is stated with where its appeal stands.
- Delay is not, by itself, misconduct
- Elapsed time is given in plain days to the archive’s review, as context. A long interval is not presented as evidence of obstruction or neglect.
- An allegation is not a fact
- What is alleged is stated with who alleges it. Where accounts conflict, each is given and none is preferred.
How the state of a case is described
- No verified investigation record
- No verified investigation record has yet been located by this archive. It does not mean that no investigation happened.
- No charge on record
- A case or complaint has been filed with the police, a court or the tribunal’s prosecution; no charge is reported in the sources read.
- No trial on record
- The prosecution has submitted formal charges; no framing of charges, trial or judgment is reported in the sources read.
- Decision on charges pending
- Formal charges have been argued before the tribunal, and it has set a date for its order on whether to frame them.
- Judgment pending
- The tribunal has framed charges and is hearing the case; no judgment yet.
- Finality not on record
- A trial court has given judgment. No appeal and no final decision are reported in the sources read, so the archive does not record the judgment as final.
- Appeal pending
- A trial court has given judgment and an appeal is on record; no decision on the appeal is recorded in this archive.
- Status not recorded
- The record does not show where accountability stands.
How absence is described
- Warrant issued by a court
- A court has ordered that the people named be arrested. A warrant is not a charge and establishes nothing about guilt.
- Wanted by police
- The police list a person as sought. It is a police notice, not a court order or a finding.
- Absconding, according to a report
- A report of a hearing or judgment says that some accused were not before the court and had not surrendered. It is a dated statement of that day, not a current count.
- Tried in absentia
- The court heard the case without the accused present. It records that they were not before the court, not where they are.
Which sources are preferred
- a court judgment, order or other judicial record
- an official investigation or tribunal record
- a government or other public institutional record
- a UN or other recognised human-rights investigation
- reputable independent journalism, labelled “Reported” and never upgraded to a court record
Sources
- 1Mugdho killing: ICT-2 fixes 11 October for charge framing order
TOB News · 23 September 2026 · News report · tob.news
Source catalogue record and provenance
↩ First cited in “Where the open record stands” - 2Charges filed against 22, including ex-minister Hasan Mahmud, over Ctg killings during July Uprising
The Business Standard · 5 April 2026 · News report · tbsnews.net
Source catalogue record and provenance
↩ First cited in “Charged, no trial on record” - 3ICT sets 16 Sept for order on framing charges over killings of Mugdho, 10 others during July Uprising
The Business Standard · 9 September 2026 · News report · tbsnews.net
Source catalogue record and provenance
↩ First cited in “Awaiting a decision on charges” - 4Ashulia body-burning case: Former MP Saiful sentenced to death
Prothom Alo · 5 February 2026 · News report · en.prothomalo.com
Source catalogue record and provenance
↩ First cited in “Judgment given, finality not on record” - 5ICT sentences ex-MP, JL leader, 4 cops to death
New Age · 5 February 2026 · News report · newagebd.net
Source catalogue record and provenance
↩ First cited in “Judgment given, finality not on record” - 6Sheikh Hasina convicted of crimes against humanity – what we know
Al Jazeera · 17 November 2025 · News report · aljazeera.com
News archive record and context
Source catalogue record and provenance
↩ First cited in “Judgments under appeal” - 7ICT prosecution files appeal to enhance Hasina’s sentence to death
The Business Standard · 15 December 2025 · News report · tbsnews.net
News archive record and context
Source catalogue record and provenance
↩ First cited in “Judgments under appeal” - 8Former ASI Amir, ex-constable Sujan to walk gallows for Abu Sayed killing
The Business Standard · 9 April 2026 · News report · tbsnews.net
News archive record and context
Source catalogue record and provenance
↩ First cited in “Judgments under appeal” - 9Abu Sayed killing: Two ex-policemen sentenced to death, 28 others jailed
Dhaka Tribune · 9 April 2026 · News report · dhakatribune.com
Source catalogue record and provenance
↩ First cited in “Judgments under appeal” - 10Abu Sayed murder case: which accused received what sentences
Prothom Alo · 9 April 2026 · News report · en.prothomalo.com
Source catalogue record and provenance
↩ First cited in “Judgments under appeal” - 11Appeals filed, Nahid calls for Hasina’s execution
The New Nation · 17 July 2026 · News report · dailynewnation.com
Source catalogue record and provenance
↩ First cited in “Judgments under appeal” - 12Ex-DMP chief Habibur, 2 others to die for Chankharpul killings during July Uprising
The Business Standard · 26 January 2026 · News report · tbsnews.net
Source catalogue record and provenance
↩ First cited in “Judgments under appeal” - 13SC orders no release of Chankharpul convicts until appeal disposal
The Business Standard · 1 February 2026 · News report · tbsnews.net
Source catalogue record and provenance
↩ First cited in “Judgments under appeal” - 14ICT issues arrest warrant against Nowfel, 14 others over Wasim killing
BSS · 25 March 2025 · News report · bssnews.net
Source catalogue record and provenance
↩ First cited in “Accused not before the court” - 15OHCHR Fact-Finding Report: Human Rights Violations and Abuses related to the Protests of July and August 2024 in Bangladesh
Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) · 12 February 2025 · UN report · ohchr.org
Source catalogue record and provenance
↩ First cited in “Accused not before the court” - 16Five on-duty journalists were martyrd during July uprising
Prothom Alo · 15 July 2025 · News report · en.prothomalo.com
Source catalogue record and provenance
↩ First cited in “Deaths still awaiting accountability” - 17Bangladesh: one year after the Monsoon Revolution, justice for six slain journalists remains elusive
Reporters Without Borders · 1 August 2025 · Rights organisation record · rsf.org
Source catalogue record and provenance
↩ First cited in “Deaths still awaiting accountability” - 18Hasan Mehedi
Committee to Protect Journalists · Rights organisation record · cpj.org
Source catalogue record and provenance
↩ First cited in “Deaths still awaiting accountability” - 192nd witness at ICT: Sheikh Hasina ordered at hospital ‘no treatment, no release’, Imran heard
Prothom Alo · 4 August 2025 · News report · en.prothomalo.com
Source catalogue record and provenance
↩ First cited in “Injuries still awaiting accountability” - 20Hasina ordered ‘no release, no treatment’ for July Uprising victims, witness tells ICT
The Business Standard · 4 August 2025 · News report · tbsnews.net
Source catalogue record and provenance
↩ First cited in “Injuries still awaiting accountability” - 21Crimes against humanity: Khokon shows disfigured face in tribunal, demands justice against Hasina
bdnews24.com · 4 August 2025 · News report · bdnews24.com
Source catalogue record and provenance
↩ First cited in “Injuries still awaiting accountability” - 22July uprising victim recounts horror of police brutality in emotional testimony
New Age · 3 August 2025 · News report · newagebd.net
Source catalogue record and provenance
↩ First cited in “Injuries still awaiting accountability” - 23Abu Sayeed was killed by bullets fired by protesters, say police
Prothom Alo · 28 July 2024 · News report · en.prothomalo.com
Source catalogue record and provenance
↩ First cited in “Disputed accounts” - 24DNA confirms identity of one of six bodies burnt during July Uprising in Ashulia
The Business Standard · 16 November 2025 · News report · tbsnews.net
News archive record and context
Source catalogue record and provenance
↩ First cited in “Disputed accounts” - 25July uprising: Many killed still remain unidentified
Prothom Alo · 5 August 2025 · News report · en.prothomalo.com
News archive record and context
Source catalogue record and provenance
↩ First cited in “What remains unknown”
What is not on this page, and why
- No separate list of open cases
- The page keeps no list of its own. Every case on it is a canonical record — a tracked proceeding, a Martyrs entry or an Injured & Survivors entry — and its state is derived from that record, so a status changed in the record changes here.
- Scheduled dates
- A date a court has set is shown as “Scheduled” until it comes. Once it has passed with no later record, the page says “No later verified update is currently recorded” and never shows the step as held.
- Freshness
- The review date is the earliest of the review dates of the records the page reads, never a build or deployment date. When it is more than 30 days old, the page says the records are awaiting review instead of presenting them as current.
- Elapsed time
- Elapsed time is given in whole days from the incident to the review date, in plain text. There is no counter, and a long interval is not presented as evidence of misconduct.
- People and absence
- Accused people are named only on Crimes & Accountability, where an individual, dated status record exists. Reports of warrants, absconding and trials in absentia are kept apart by their legal terms, never added together, and nobody is called a fugitive.
- Not included
- The scale of cases filed across Bangladesh after August 2024 is recorded on Crimes & Accountability, not case by case here: the archive lists only cases whose records it has read. Questions that rest on no reviewed record — why a step has not been taken, or who decided it — are not asked.
- Privacy
- No addresses, contact or identity numbers, family details, medical detail or witness identities beyond those reported from public hearings. Injuries are not described here; the Injured & Survivors record holds what each person has made public.
Continue the record
Crimes & Accountability
Investigations, trials and judgments, from allegation to judgment.
Martyrs
The register of those who died.
Injured & Survivors
The wounded and those who survived.