Skip to main content
Justice for Hadi1993–2025

The July archive · Injured & Survivors

Injured & Survivors

A documented record of people who were injured in Bangladesh’s uprising of July and August 2024 and survived — who they are, what happened to them, and what has followed.

People in the record
3 · an open record
Ordered by
Date of injury, then A–Z
Archive reviewed through

Not a complete list, and not a ranking, drawing on 22 published sources. Skip to sources

01: People, not injuries

What this record is

This record holds people who were injured during the uprising of July and August 2024 and survived: who each person is, what happened to them, when and where, what has followed in their own public account, where accountability for the injury stands, and what remains unresolved.

It begins with people, not injuries. Each entry opens with who the person is; an injury is stated once, in plain words, only as far as the record needs. No one is ranked, and nothing here measures how badly anyone was hurt.

It is open, and far from complete. Thousands of protesters were seriously injured, the UN fact-finding report found; the record holds the people the archive has so far been able to document to its standard, and grows as records are read. [1]

Survivors and Heroes
This record documents an injury and what followed; the Heroes registers document a contribution. Being injured is not, by itself, a judgment about anyone’s part in July. A person appears in both only when each standard is met on its own, and the entries link to each other rather than repeat.
Survivors and Martyrs
The Martyrs register records deaths. A person who later died of injuries from July belongs there; an entry here would say so in one line and point to it, so that no one is recorded as living on one page and dead on another.

02: Beyond the count of the dead

The human cost beyond death

July’s cost is not measured by the dead alone. Alongside hundreds of killings, the UN fact-finding report found serious injuries to thousands of protesters, and that most of those killed were shot with military rifles or with shotguns loaded with metal pellets. [1]

The categories the government set for supporting the injured, revised in February 2025, describe what lasting injury means in practice: the loss of an eye, a hand or a leg; blindness; brain injury; being unable to live or work independently; and, for those expected to recover, hospital treatment before they can work again. [2]

Care itself was contested. Doctors and other medical staff treated wounded protesters at great personal risk, the UN report found, while some hospitals were pressured not to admit them. [1]

The entries below record what this has meant for particular people, in their own public accounts: months in hospital, repeated operations, treatment abroad, the loss of an eye or a limb. One person’s experience is never taken to stand for everyone’s.

03: Standard

How a survivor is recorded

A person is given an entry only when the record can answer each of these questions. Until it can, they are listed under Not yet in the record.

  1. Is the person identified by name in at least two independent publications, or in the record of a court?
  2. Is the injury itself documented, with its date?
  3. Do the sources connect it to the protests or the crackdown of July and August 2024?
  4. Is the place known at least to the district?
  5. Is it known who says how the person was injured — and is every differing account kept?
  6. Was the person an adult at the time, and can the record be published without exposing a family member, an address or a private medical record?

Not considered

  • the title “July warrior” or a place on an official list alone — recognition is recorded, but it is not evidence of what happened to a person
  • how badly someone was hurt — the record is not a ranking of injury
  • fame, political affiliation, or how widely a story was shared
  • a social-media post or fundraising appeal with no publication behind it

04: Survivors

The record

Ordered by the date of injury, then alphabetically. No entry is set above another.

Content note

This record describes people who were shot or otherwise injured during the protests of July and August 2024. It contains no images, and states injuries only as far as the record requires.

  1. Abdullah Al Imran

    আবদুল্লাহ আল ইমরান [3]

    Who they are
    A student of Dhaka College. [4] The Daily Campus describes him as a member of the college unit’s convening committee of Jatiyatabadi Chhatra Dal, the BNP’s student wing. [5]
    Injured
    Where
    Bijoynagar water tank area, Dhaka

    What happened

    1. Shot in the leg, below the left knee, in the Bijoynagar water tank area at about 3 p.m. Two other protesters were killed there, he testified. [6, 7]

      Reported — published by the reports cited; not yet checked against a primary record. Sources: Prothom Alo; Dhaka Tribune.

    2. 26 or 27 July 2024

      While he was being treated at the National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Rehabilitation (NITOR) in Dhaka, the prime minister visited the ward. He testified that he heard her tell the hospital’s help desk “No treatment, no release”, and that afterwards his surgery was delayed, medicine could not be brought in from outside and his father could not take him out of the hospital. [6, 4, 7]

      Alleged — an allegation by his testimony before International Crimes Tribunal-1 on 4 August 2025, on which the defence cross-examined him; the sources read do not say whether the tribunal made a finding on it; it has not been established. Sources: Prothom Alo; The Business Standard; Dhaka Tribune.

    Since then

    He told the tribunal in August 2025 that his care improved after 5 August, when he was moved to a cabin, and that he had since had 25 operations on the leg, which he could not move. [7]

    In January 2026, citing a social-media post by a Chhatra Dal leader, The Daily Campus reported that he was still in hospital seventeen months after he was shot, and that treatment in Thailand under government arrangement had not brought the hoped-for result. [5]

    In their words

    ‘আমি বলি, পুলিশ আমাকে সরাসরি গুলি করে। পুলিশের পোশাকে কারা ছিল, সেটা আমি জানি না।’ [3]

    “I said yes, they had fired directly at me, though I didn’t know who the people in the police uniform were.” [6]

    — Abdullah Al Imran, . Testifying before International Crimes Tribunal-1, on his answer when the prime minister asked whether the police had shot him. In English as published by Prothom Alo’s English edition, reporting the same hearing.

    Accountability

    No case on record — as of

    No case or investigation over his shooting is reported in the sources read.

    Testified on as the second prosecution witness in The case against Sheikh Hasina and two others [6, 4].

    What remains unresolved

    Who fired at him has not been established, and no court in the sources read has decided whether the instruction he described was given.

  2. Atikul Gazi

    Also spelled RJ Atikul Gazi

    Who they are
    Worked as a salesman at a shopping complex in Uttara, Dhaka, and joined the protests there from 18 July 2024, he told The Business Standard. [8]
    Injured
    Where
    Uttara, Dhaka

    What happened

    1. Shot in Uttara on the afternoon of 5 August, after the prime minister had left the country, as he went to help a wounded protester. He lost his left arm. [8, 9]

      Reported — published by the reports cited; not yet checked against a primary record. Sources: The Business Standard; Al Jazeera.

    2. Police in Uttara were still firing on protesters when he was shot, he told The Business Standard: “I begged them not to shoot us. I told them our fight wasn’t with you. But they didn’t listen.” [8]

      Alleged — an allegation by his own account to The Business Standard; no investigation of the shooting is reported; it has not been established. Sources: The Business Standard.

    Since then

    By his account, treatment was delayed for a day at a hospital in Dhaka before he was moved to NITOR, where the limb was amputated. [8]

    From September 2024 he posted videos about the uprising on TikTok; a year later he told Al Jazeera that he wanted the dead and the injured to be remembered. [8, 9]

    In their words

    “I want people to remember us. That they don’t forget who we are and what we did.” [8]

    — Atikul Gazi, . Speaking to The Business Standard two months after he was injured. In English, as published by The Business Standard.

    Accountability

    No case on record — as of

    No case or investigation over his shooting is reported in the sources read.

    What remains unresolved

    Who fired at him is not established; the only account of the shooting in the sources read is his own.

  3. Khokon Chandra Barman

    খোকন চন্দ্র বর্মণ [3]

    Also spelled Khokan Chandra Barman

    Who they are
    Worked as a driver. [6, 10] He joined the protests on 18 July 2024 and regularly after that, he told the tribunal. [11]
    Injured
    Where
    In front of Jatrabari police station, Dhaka

    What happened

    1. Shot in the face in front of Jatrabari police station at around midday, as protesters marching from Signboard towards central Dhaka came under fire. He lost his left eye. [12, 11, 10]

      Reported — published by the reports cited; not yet checked against a primary record. Sources: The Business Standard; bdnews24.com; New Age.

    Who fired: the accounts given at the tribunal

    Khokon Chandra Barman, testifying on 3 August 2025
    Police withdrew into Jatrabari police station when the army arrived; after the army left, police came out and fired on protesters sheltering under the flyover, and an officer fired at him where he had taken cover. [11, 10]
    Defence counsel for Sheikh Hasina and Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal, cross-examining
    Said that police did not fire on protesters and that demonstrators were injured or killed by their own weapons, and pointed to differences between his statement in court and his earlier statement to investigators. He answered that this was not true. [11, 10]

    Since then

    He was treated at several hospitals in Dhaka, for the longest period at the National Institute of Burn and Plastic Surgery, he told the tribunal. [11, 10]

    The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare sent him to the M.V. Lomonosov University Clinic in Moscow on 21 February 2025 for reconstructive treatment. [12, 11] No other hospital had agreed to treat him, The Business Standard reported. [12] The first phase of surgery took place there on 22 April 2025. [13]

    In August 2025 he told the tribunal that his treatment was continuing, that further treatment was not available in Bangladesh, and that he had not fully recovered. [11]

    In their words

    “I am proud that my sacrifice helped bring down a regime built on discrimination.” [9]

    — Khokon Chandra Barman, . Speaking to Al Jazeera a year after the uprising. In English, as published by Al Jazeera.

    Accountability

    No case on record — as of

    No case or investigation over his own shooting is reported in the sources read. The case he testified in concerns the crackdown as a whole. [11]

    Testified on as the first prosecution witness in The case against Sheikh Hasina and two others [11, 10].

    What remains unresolved

    No court has decided who fired the shot that injured him; at the tribunal the defence disputed that police fired at all. [11]

05: Lives

Lives and places

What the people in the record were doing in their lives, and where they were injured. All 3 people in the record so far were injured in Dhaka. People were injured across Bangladesh; the gap shows where research is needed.

StudentsStudents of a university or college at the time, as the sources describe them.
Working peoplePeople who were in work at the time, as the sources describe them.

Where they were injured

Places are given at the level of a district or city, or a public landmark, never an address. People injured in Chattogram and Narayanganj are listed under Not yet in the record. No map is drawn until the record holds enough entries to plot without guesswork.

06: Court record

Testimony in court

Some survivors have given evidence before the International Crimes Tribunal. The case below concerns the crackdown as a whole; its judgment is not a finding about who injured any one witness.

The case against Sheikh Hasina and two others

Convicted at first instance — as of · International Crimes Tribunal-1, Dhaka

Survivors in this record who testified

Court
International Crimes Tribunal-1, Dhaka: a three-member tribunal headed by Justice Golam Mortuza Mozumder. [14]
Concerning
Crimes against humanity in the government’s crackdown on the protests of July and August 2024. [15]
Judgment
17 November 2025: guilty on charges under the doctrine of superior command responsibility. [15, 14]
Appeal
On 15 December 2025 the prosecution appealed to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, seeking to raise the sentences of imprisonment until natural death imposed on Sheikh Hasina and Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal to death. [14] No judgment on the appeal is recorded in this archive.

A judgment at first instance can be changed on appeal; an appeal whose outcome is not in the sources read is stated as not on record. The legal status of each person tried is recorded on Crimes & Accountability.

07: Accountability

Where accountability stands

For each person in the record, the stage reached by any case over their injury, with the date of the latest source, and the case they testified in. A status describes a proceeding, never a finding about a person.

Where responsibility is not established, the unanswered questions are carried forward on Unresolved Justice.

08: Care and support

Treatment, support and rehabilitation

What the state announced for the injured, and what it later reported providing, each dated by its source. An announcement is not a payment, and an official figure is the government’s own account.

  1. Announced

    Ministry of Health; Liberation War Affairs Adviser

    The health ministry had registered about 13,848 people injured in the uprising and revised the three categories in which they would be supported. The Liberation War Affairs adviser said the injured would receive identity cards, lifelong allowances and medical benefits: a one-time Tk5 lakh and Tk20,000 a month in Category A, Tk3 lakh and Tk15,000 a month in Category B, and in Category C priority in rehabilitation and employment but no direct payment. [2]

  2. Reported as delivered

    Ministry of Health and Family Welfare

    Had sent 38 injured people to Singapore and Thailand for treatment; three had returned home. [12]

  3. Official statement

    Ministry of Liberation War Affairs

    Published a gazette recognising 493 critically injured people as “July Warriors” in Category A. [16]

  4. Official statement

    Liberation War Affairs Minister, answering a question in parliament

    Said that 13,344 of the 14,369 gazetted July warriors were receiving a monthly allowance in their bank accounts — Tk20,000, Tk15,000 or Tk10,000 by category — and that the rest were being brought in; that injured July warriors were treated free at government hospitals; that 152 had been sent to Thailand, Singapore, Turkey and Russia for treatment, of whom 102 had returned; and that 1,937 people from among the July warriors and the families of the dead had been referred for training and rehabilitation support. [17]

Concerns the injured have raised

  1. Injured people at NITOR in Dhaka, and members of a Students Against Discrimination committee who visited them, said that patients were being refused readmission after going home and were not receiving proper care. The committee’s president said the hospital’s director told them he was helpless, and called for those in critical condition to be sent abroad. [18]

    Alleged — an allegation by injured patients and the committee, as reported by The Business Standard; the hospital gave no explanation in the report; it has not been established. Sources: The Business Standard.

What individual people have said about their own treatment and support is recorded in their entries, attributed to them. One person’s experience is not taken to stand for everyone’s.

09: The record of injury

Counting the injured

There is no single agreed number. Each published figure is set out with who produced it, what it counts, over what period and how. The size of this record is not a count of the injured.

  • 841 deaths; 12,272 injuries

    Produced by
    Ministry of Health, as cited by OHCHR
    What it counts
    Deaths related to the protests (10 of them women) and injuries recorded by the health authorities
    Period
    The protests
    As of
    When the OHCHR report was finalised
    How
    Hospital records. OHCHR considers them incomplete: staff were overwhelmed, some patients gave no or false names to avoid arrest, families buried some of the dead quickly, and in some cases health authorities were intimidated into not registering deaths. [1]
  • About 13,848 people

    Produced by
    Ministry of Health, as reported by Dhaka Tribune
    What it counts
    People injured in the uprising whom the ministry registered for treatment and support
    Period
    July–August 2024
    As of
    Reported 17 February 2025
    How
    A registration list for assistance, divided into three categories. It records people who were registered, not everyone who was injured. [2]
  • 493 people

    Produced by
    Ministry of Liberation War Affairs
    What it counts
    Critically injured people recognised as “July Warriors” in “Category A”
    Period
    July–August 2024
    As of
    Gazette reported on 28 February 2025
    How
    An official gazette of recognition, not a count of all who were injured. [16]
  • 14,369 people

    Produced by
    Ministry of Liberation War Affairs, as stated in parliament
    What it counts
    Gazetted “July warriors”: people injured in the uprising or who took part in it, as the minister’s answer is reported
    Period
    July–August 2024
    As of
    18 June 2026
    How
    An official list of recognition and entitlement. Its scope as reported includes people who took part as well as the injured, so it is not a count of injuries. [17]
  • 44 police officers killed

    Produced by
    Bangladesh Police, BGB, Ansar/VDP and RAB, as cited by OHCHR
    What it counts
    Members of the security forces, each force’s own figure: police 44 killed and 2,308 injured; BGB 3 killed and 129 injured; Ansar/VDP 3 and 63; RAB 2 and 307
    Period
    1 July – 15 August 2024
    As of
    Provided to OHCHR before February 2025
    How
    Each force’s own figures for its members. [1]

The archive’s position

Figure adopted
None. A hospital count, a registration list for assistance and a gazette of recognition count different things; none is a count of everyone who was injured.
Why the figures differ
Hospital records are incomplete: staff were overwhelmed and some patients gave no or false names to avoid arrest, the UN report notes. Official lists record the people who registered and were recognised. [1]
What would change this
A published, reconciled count of the injured with its method, from an official or independent body. When one is found it will be added here, with its date.

10: Disputed and unresolved

Where the records differ

Sources disagree on some details — where, when, what an injury has left, what support provides. The record does not choose silently: each account is set out with who gave it.

Where was Khokon Chandra Barman shot?

bdnews24.com, New Age and The Business Standard
At Jatrabari in Dhaka: in front of the police station, or under the flyover beside it. [11, 10, 12]
Al Jazeera, 5 August 2025
In the Narayanganj district. [9]

What the record does: The entry gives Jatrabari, Dhaka, as every report of his testimony does. He told the tribunal that he joined the march at Signboard, which bdnews24.com places in Narayanganj, before it reached Jatrabari; the archive has not established whether that explains the difference.

When was Khokon Chandra Barman in Russia for treatment?

The Business Standard, February and May 2025
Sent on 21 February 2025; returned on 7 May, after the first phase of surgery on 22 April. [12, 13]
bdnews24.com, reporting his testimony
Sent on 21 February; returned on 7 April. [11]
New Age, reporting his testimony
Flown to Russia on 21 January 2025; returned on 7 April. [10]

What the record does: The entry gives the departure date that two reports agree on and the date of the first surgery, and no date of return.

What has Abdullah Al Imran’s injury left?

Dhaka Tribune’s description of the witness
Describes him as the witness “who lost his left leg in the police firing”. [7]
His testimony, as the same report quotes it
“So far, there have been 25 surgeries on my leg. But I cannot move my leg, and it will not work anymore.” [7]

What the record does: The entry gives his own words. It does not say that the leg was amputated, which his testimony as reported does not state.

What do people in Category C receive?

The announcement, February 2025
Priority in rehabilitation and employment, but no direct financial aid. [2]
The minister in parliament, June 2026
A monthly allowance of Tk10,000, paid with those of Categories A and B. [17]

What the record does: Both are dated and kept: the terms appear to have changed between them. The later statement is the most recent on record; the archive has not checked it against payments.

11: Research in progress

Not yet in the record

People and groups named in published reports who do not yet have an entry. They are part of this history; what is missing is stated, not hidden.

Shuvo Mahmud

A student of the Bangla department at Chittagong University who lost the sight of his right eye after he was shot at Muradpur, Chattogram, on the afternoon of 16 July 2024, according to BSS. [19]

Missing: A second independent publication: BSS is the only report the archive has read.

Abu Hanif

A madrasa student who lost the sight of his right eye after he was hit by a rubber bullet at Chashara, Narayanganj, on 5 August 2024, according to Dhaka Tribune. [20]

Missing: A second independent publication: Dhaka Tribune is the only report read.

Sinthia Mehrin Sokal

A final-year criminology student at the University of Dhaka who was hit on the head during the protest on 15 July 2024, by an activist of the Chhatra League, the Awami League’s student wing, according to Al Jazeera. [9]

Missing: A second independent publication: Al Jazeera is the only report read.

Parveen

A day labourer who gave evidence before International Crimes Tribunal-1 on 4 August 2025 and who lost an eye, according to The Business Standard; [21] Dhaka Tribune reports that she lost her eyesight. [22]

Missing: Her full name, and when and where she was injured: the reports read give one name and no detail of the incident.

Other witnesses at the tribunal

Later witnesses in the same case included injured protesters, The Business Standard reports; Dhaka Tribune lists among the witnesses of 17 August 2025 a vegetable vendor, Abdus Samad, and a student, Nayeem Shikder. [21, 22]

Missing: A report of what happened to each: the reports read list them as witnesses without describing their injuries.

Children

Children were among the injured: on 5 August alone, the UN investigators found several young children among those killed and wounded. [1]

Missing: Nothing that the record will add: children are not named here. Their injuries are part of this history and of the counts.

Members of the security forces

The police reported 2,308 of their members injured between 1 July and 15 August 2024, and the other forces their own figures. [1]

Missing: Named records the archive has read. Their injuries are connected to July and will be recorded to the same standard as every other.

12: Continue

Elsewhere in the archive

Many who were shot in July did not survive. Their names and records are kept in the memorial register.

Published

  • Crimes & AccountabilityPublished

    Investigations, trials and judgments over July, with each person’s legal status in each case, dated and sourced.

  • Unresolved JusticePublished

    Injuries and deaths whose responsibility is not established, and proceedings still open.

  • July HeroesPublished

    People whose documented part in July is widely recognised. An injury alone does not place anyone there.

  • Unsung HeroesPublished

    People whose part was substantial but less visible: journalists, lawyers and others.

About this record

Sources and method

Each entry was compiled by Justice for Hadi from news reports and the reports of tribunal hearings, each read in full, and from the UN fact-finding report. Every numbered citation points to the publication that reports the fact. What a witness told the tribunal is cited to the reports of the hearing: the archive holds no transcript, so it is marked “Reported” or, where it is a claim about another person, “Alleged”, never “Court record”.

Every claim carries the project’s evidence word in text. “Reported” means published by the sources cited and not yet checked against a primary record. “Alleged” means a claim made by someone — the person, a witness, the defence — that has not been established, and names who made it. None of these records has yet been through the project’s formal verification process.

July archive reviewed through . A wrong name, date, place, description of an injury, photograph or status is serious. To correct a record, ask for one to be removed, or propose a person with sources, see corrections; meaningful corrections are noted, not silently overwritten. For how the project works, see the research methodology.

How accountability is described

No case on record
No case, complaint or investigation over the injury is reported in the sources read. It does not mean none exists.
Case filed
A complaint or case over the injury has been lodged with the police, a court or the tribunal’s prosecution; no charges are on record.
Formal charges submitted
The prosecution has put formal charges to a court; the court has not yet tried them.
Trial ongoing
A court has framed charges and is hearing the case.
Convicted at first instance
A trial court has given judgment. Appeals may follow; until a final decision, it is not the last word.
Acquitted
A court has found the accused not guilty.
Unresolved
The record does not show where accountability stands.

How support is described

Announced
A decision or promise, as reported when it was made. It does not show that anything was paid or provided.
Reported as delivered
A report that support was provided, as the source states it. The archive has not checked it against records of payment or treatment.
Official statement
A figure an official gave, as reported. It is the government’s own account, not an independent count.

Sources

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22

What is not on this page, and why

An open record
The record does not claim to be complete, and its size says nothing about how many were injured: the published counts are set out under Counting the injured, and none is adopted.
Medical privacy
Injuries are stated once, in plain words, as far as the record needs. No diagnoses, medical records, hospital registration numbers, prescriptions, scans or private treatment notes are published. Hospitals and treatment abroad are named only where the person told it in public or a report published it.
No ranking of injury
The record is ordered by date of injury, then name. It has no severity labels, no injury types as filters and no measure of how badly anyone was hurt. The government’s categories are described only as the terms of its support.
Mental health
Psychological consequences are recorded only where the person has made them public and they are material to the record. None is recorded here.
Children
No child is named. People who were children when they were injured are part of this history and of the counts; they are not profiled, and no school, family or image of a child is published.
Families and homes
Family members are not named or quoted, even where the sources do. No home addresses, present whereabouts, telephone numbers, identity documents or financial circumstances are published.
Who caused an injury
Who fired is stated as who said it — the person, a witness, the defence — with the accounts side by side where they differ. People accused or convicted are named only as parties to a proceeding, with its stage and date. A judgment in a case a survivor testified in is not a finding about who injured them.
Testimony and translation
Words are quoted as the cited source prints them, with the date and the setting. English is the publication’s own; a Bangla original is given only where a Bangla source prints it, set in Bangla, beside the English it corresponds to.
No photographs
The archive does not hold a photograph of anyone in this record with a documented creator and permission to publish. None is shown, no placeholder is drawn in its place, and no illustration, AI-generated likeness or image of an injury, hospital bed or operation is used.
No search or filters yet
While the record is small it is read in order. When it is large enough to need them, filters will offer date, place, occupation and accountability — never injury type or severity.
Sources not used
Reports that could not be read in full on the review date, encyclopedia entries, trial-monitoring indexes and social-media posts were used only as leads. A social-media post is cited only as a publication reported it.

Continue the record